Big band performances/mic choices
Hi people, i have two public events coming up this weekend for te ANZAC services, one involves a few big band <brass> performances in a quite difficult environment, a big park with plenty of reflective surfaces <surrounding buildings, trees,pergolas etc>, my main concern is effective spread and separation to the punters and to a lesser extent how to deal with phase issues related to late reflections from the surrounds<i was thinking about putting two mics up the back to capture the "open parkiness feel" as a reference, i wont be feeding them into the main mix obviously>. In regards to that last one i was thinking about taking a stereo split and keeping it for reference. But i don't think it will have any effect if i mic it up correctly.
The PA im using has a fairly good widebeam delivery so i'm confident it can do the job, well actually it does the job, im the spanner in the works haha.
So yeah, im thinking because one band is 20 odd performers when i'm making mic choices and positions i should consider how the band is arranged, like low end <tubas,baritone horns etc> at the back and the more higher pitched stuff<cornets etc> towards the front? and if i cant site them in the optimal configuration how would i get the best sound from the performance in relation to mic choices and positions.
I should mention that i've been asked to put the rider together<a test i think>,The rider is six 58's, six 57's, 8 assorted small diaphragm cardioid condensers and a couple of large diaphragm omni condensors. the console is a yamaha ls9/32. im thinking to just overhead the majority of the front end and close mic the bigger stuff, also i was thinking about using a lot of shelving and a little panning on channels to get even separation. But after some thought about it i thought that maybe it would be better to close mic the higher end stuff as the bigger waveform from the tubas and stuff could just overtake the smaller instruments? Although having said that i'm sure the higher spl's delivered by the trumpets/cornets etc would definitely cut through the lower stuff, its just a phase thing that worries me.
Am i taking this a little too seriously? By this i mean should i be taking the studio approach to an event like this? Part of me says the punters wont even care but the other part says "mate, you never know who is going to be listening".
Advice is always appreciated.
The PA im using has a fairly good widebeam delivery so i'm confident it can do the job, well actually it does the job, im the spanner in the works haha.
So yeah, im thinking because one band is 20 odd performers when i'm making mic choices and positions i should consider how the band is arranged, like low end <tubas,baritone horns etc> at the back and the more higher pitched stuff<cornets etc> towards the front? and if i cant site them in the optimal configuration how would i get the best sound from the performance in relation to mic choices and positions.
I should mention that i've been asked to put the rider together<a test i think>,The rider is six 58's, six 57's, 8 assorted small diaphragm cardioid condensers and a couple of large diaphragm omni condensors. the console is a yamaha ls9/32. im thinking to just overhead the majority of the front end and close mic the bigger stuff, also i was thinking about using a lot of shelving and a little panning on channels to get even separation. But after some thought about it i thought that maybe it would be better to close mic the higher end stuff as the bigger waveform from the tubas and stuff could just overtake the smaller instruments? Although having said that i'm sure the higher spl's delivered by the trumpets/cornets etc would definitely cut through the lower stuff, its just a phase thing that worries me.
Am i taking this a little too seriously? By this i mean should i be taking the studio approach to an event like this? Part of me says the punters wont even care but the other part says "mate, you never know who is going to be listening".
Advice is always appreciated.